Current forest management intensity and cost associated with major forestry practices in Arkansas, USA
Main Article Content
Keywords
consulting foresters, family forest owners, industrial or corporate forest, forest management, cost
Abstract
Arkansas’ forestlands are largely owned by private landowners: family, industrial or corporate forest landowners (5.1 million hectares; 67%). Family forest landowners own 4.4 million hectares of forestland (58%). The costs of forestry practices influence landowners’ decisions in forest management. However, state-specific costs for forestry activities are not readily available. The study aims to compare the forest management objectives between family and industrial or corporate forest landowners and also provide robust information about forest management intensity and the unit cost associated with those activities. We employed an online survey to 318 consulting foresters working in the state. In addition, we used Forest Inventory and Analysis dataset in ArcMap (10.8.1) to validate the survey result. Among various forestry practices, landowners requested various services from consulting foresters, including chemical site preparation, thinning, timber cruising and marking, and timber inventory. The unit cost for mechanical site preparation was the highest among several forestry practices, and these costs varied based on forest types. Various stakeholders can utilize the study findings from landowners, forest industries, and policymakers in forest investment decision-making, which can improve sustainable forest management.
References
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101283
Alabama Cooperative Extension System. 2018. Cost for common forestry practices in the South. 2018. Available online: www.aces.edu/natural-resources/forestry/economics-management/forestrypractice.php (accessed on 10/21/2018)
Arkansas Department of Agriculture. 2022. Arkansas's forest facts. Available from: https://www.agriculture.arkansas.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/2021-Forest-Facts-of-AR-1.pdf (accessed on 11/30/22)
Arano KG, Cushing TL, Munn IA. 2002. Forest management expenses of Mississippi's nonindustrial private forest landowners. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 26(2), 93-98. https://doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/26.2.93
Arano KG, Munn IA. 2006. Evaluating forest management intensity: a comparison among major forest landowner types. Forest Policy and Economics, 9(3), 237-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.07.011
Arkansas Center for Forest Business. 2021. County forests and forest industry, 2021. Arkansas Center for Forest Business, University of Arkansas at Monticello. Report 20021-C1-75. Monticello, AR.
Bair LS, Alig RJ. 2006. Regional cost information for private timberland conversion and management. USDA Forest Sercice Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-684. Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR. 26p. https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-GTR-684
Belli ML, Straka TJ, Dubois M, Watson WF. 1993. Costs and cost trends for forestry practices in the South. For. Farmer, 52(3), 25-31.
Birch TW. 1997. Private forestland owners of the southern United States, 1994. USDA Forest Service, Research Bulletin, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station-138. 195 p. doi: 10.2737/NE-RB-137. https://doi.org/10.2737/NE-RB-137
Callaghan DW, Khanal PN, Straka TJ. 2019. An analysis of costs and cost trends for southern forestry practices. J For. 117: 21-29. https://doi.10.1093/jofore/fvy060
Chhetri SG, Gordon JS, Munn IA, Henderson JE. 2018. Factors influencing the use of consulting foresters by non-industrial private forest landowners in Mississippi. The Forestry Chronicle, 94(3), 254-259.
Chhetri SG, Parker J, Izlar RL, Li Y. 2022. Forest management practices and costs for family forest landowners in Georgia, USA. Forests, 13(5): 665.
https://doi.org/10.3390/f13050665
Chhetri SG, Gordon J, Munn I, Henderson J. 2019. Comparison of the timber management expenses of nonindustrial private forest landowners in Mississippi, United States: Results from 1995-1997 and 2015. Environments, 6(9):107. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6090107
Cleaves DA, Haines TK, Martinez J. 1999. Prescribed burning costs: trends and influences in the National Forest System. In Proc. of the Symposium on fire economics, planning, and policy: Bottom lines (pp. 277-287). USDA For. Serv., Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-173, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA. https://doi.org/10.2737/SRS-GTR-37
Conway C, Amacher G, Sullivan J. 2003. Decisions forest landowners make: an empirical examination. J.For.Econ. 9: 81-203. https://doi.org/10.1078/1104-6899-00034
Conrad IV JL, Bolding MC, Smith RL, Aust, WM. 2011. Wood-energy market impact on competition, procurement practices, and profitability of landowners and forest products industry in the U.S. South. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(1), 280-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.038
Dubois MR, Straka TJ, Watson WF. 1991. A cost index for southern forest practices. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 15(3), 128-133.
https://doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/15.3.128
Egan, A.F. 1997. From timber to forests and people: a view of nonindustrial private forest research. North J Appl For. 14: 189-193.
https://doi.org/10.1093/njaf/14.4.189
Kline J, Alig R, Johnson R. 2000. Fostering the production of nontimber services among forest owners with heterogeneous objectives. For Sci. 46: 302-311.
Kluender RA, Walkingstick TL. 2000. Rethinking how nonindustrial landowners view their lands. South J App For, 24(3):150-158.
https://doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/24.3.150
Maggard A. 2021. Costs & trends of southern forestry practices 2020. Forestry and Wildlife, Extension Alabama A & M & Auburn Universities. FOR-2115. Auburn AL. 6 p.
Maggard A, Barlow R. 2018. Special report: 2016 costs and trends for southern forestry practices. Forest Landowner. Carrollton, GA, pp. 31-39
Mississippi State University Extension. 2022. Pine straw mulch production. Available from http://extension.msstate.edu/forestry/forest-management/pine-straw-mulch-production. (accessed on 11/14/2022)
Moak JE. 1982. Forest practices cost trends in the South. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 6(3), 130-132. https://doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/6.3.130
Newman DH, Wear DN. 1993. Production economics of private forestry: a comparison of industrial and nonindustrial forest owners. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75(3), 674-684. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243574
Pelkki M, Sherman G. 2020. Forestry's economic contribution in the United States, 2016. Forest Products Journal, 70(1), 28-38. doi:10.13073/FPJ-D-19-00037. https://doi.org/10.13073/FPJ-D-19-00037
Rubino EC, Tian N, Pelkki, MH. 2022. Improving communications to increase nonindustrial private forest landowner (NIPF) participation in forest certification programs: a case study in Arkansas, USA. Forests, 13(1): 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13010086
Tanger, SM, Blazier, M. 2019. Management and economic considerations for mixed pine-hardwood stands. Louisiana State University Agriculture Center. Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service. Pub. 3700. 4p.
Tian N, Pelkki M. 2021. Economic Contributions of Arkansas forest industries in 2021. Arkansas Center for Forest Business, University of Arkansas at Monticello, Fact Sheet F2021-1. Available from: https://www.uamont.edu/academics/CFANR/forestbusiness/EconomicContributionsSummary2021.pdf. (accessed 08/18/2022).
USDA Forest Service. 2021. Family forest (10+acres) ownership characteristics: Arkansas, 2018. Res Note NRS-266. Madison, WI. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 2 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/NRS-RN-266
USDA Forest Service. 2022. State and private forestry fact sheet. Arkansas 2022. Available from: https://apps.fs.usda.gov/nicportal/temppdf/sfs/naweb/AR_std.pdf (accessed on 11/30/2022).
Qualtrics. 2022. Accessed from: https://www.qualtrics.com
Wicker G. 2002. Motivation for private forest landowners. Southern forest resource assessment, 225-237.
Wright WC, Munn IA. 2016. Fees and services of Mississippi's consulting foresters; Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University: Starkville, MS, USA.
Zhang D, Warren S, Bailey C. 1998. The role of assistance foresters in nonindustrial private forest management: Alabama landowners' perspectives. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 22(2), 101-105. https://doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/22.2.101
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in the journal. The journal retains no copyright.
