U.S. Proposed Tariff on the Wood Sector within North America

Main Article Content

Abdallah Akintola https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5593-1887
Indroneil Ganguly https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9075-2665
Badri Narayanan Gopalakrishnan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9628-8173
Kent Wheiler https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8935-1525

Keywords

CGE model, cross-laminated timber, forest, global trade model, mass timber, tariff

Abstract

This study evaluates the implications of the United States (U.S.) proposed tariffs on North American wood markets. Two scenarios were modeled using a ‘wood sector’-tailored FOrest Trade Equilibrium Model (FOTEM), which utilizes a general equilibrium model framework. The first scenario considered the U.S. imposing tariffs without retaliation from Canada and Mexico, and the second scenario modeled retaliatory tariffs from Canada and Mexico. Results indicate that U.S. GDP remains largely unaffected. Still, the U.S. wood sector suffers output losses under retaliation, particularly in hardwood lumber and paper-related industries (printing and publishing), which depend heavily on North American trade flows. Both Canada and Mexico experience contraction in their GDP and would be better off without retaliation. Canada emerges as the most affected partner, with severe disruptions in engineered panels and softwood products. Mexico’s Fiberboard, Furniture, Oriented Strand Board, and Pellets sectors show increased output due to trade diversion, though domestic resource and production constraints may limit these gains. The study highlights that protectionist measures can shield select industries in the short term but risk disrupting integrated supply chains and weakening overall competitiveness. The study concludes that coordinated trade policies are essential to sustain domestic production while reducing destabilization across North American wood markets.

Abstract 32 | View Full Text Downloads 0 Download PDF Downloads 14

References

Aguiar A, Chepeliev M, Corong E, Van Der Mensbrugghe D. 2022. The global trade analysis project (GTAP) data base: Version 11. J Glob Econ Anal. 7(2). https://doi.org/10.21642/JGEA.070201AF

Akintola A, Boughanmi H, Antimiani A, Zaibet L, Kotagama H. 2022. Deeper integration or open regionalism in the Indian Ocean Rim Association (IORA). J Econ Integr. 37(4):705-733. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2022.37.4.705

Al Shamakhi A, Akintola A, Boughanmi H. 2018. Assessing the impact of WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement on Oman's economy. Int J Trade Econ Finance. 9(6). https://doi.org/10.18178/ijtef.2018.9.6.623

Amato D. 2023. Economic Forecast 2024: A cross-border outlook on interest rates, inflation, housing and more. RBC Royal Bank. Available from: https://www.rbcroyalbank.com/en-ca/my-money-matters/goals-aspirations/travel-and-cross-border/economic-forecast-2024-a-cross-border-outlook-on-interest-rates-inflation-housing-and-more/

Barnes J. 2024. Analyzing the current forest products market. ResourceWise. Available from: https://www.resourcewise.com/blog/forest-products-blog/analyzing-the-current-forest-products-market

Boubacar I. 2024. US imports of softwood lumber: assessing the significance of spillover effects. For Policy Econ. 160:103162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103162

Brandt K, Latta G, Camenzind D, Dolan J, Bender D, Wilson A, Wolcott M. 2021. Projected cross-laminated timber demand and lumber supply analysis. BioResources. 16(1). https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.16.1.862-881

Britz W. 2022. Disaggregating agro-food sectors in the GTAP data base. J Glob Econ Anal. 7(1):44-75. https://doi.org/10.21642/JGEA.070102AF

Bruck SR, Chizmar S, Parajuli R, Frey GE, Lamica A, Sills EO. 2024. A qualitative assessment of interrelated impacts of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the timber supply chain in the southern United States. Soc Nat Resour. 37(10):1491-1507. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2024.2380451

Capital Press. 2022. Northwest vs. Southeast: Timber industry grows where it thrives. Available from: https://capitalpress.com/2022/05/12/northwest-vs-southeast-timber-industry-grows-where-it-thrives/

Claessens S, Kose MA. 2012. Recession: when bad times prevail. IMF Financ Dev. 49(1). Available from: https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/Fandd/Back-to-Basics/claessens-recession.ashx

CoPS. 2022. RunGTAP Help: Solution methods. Centre of Policy Studies. Available from: https://www.copsmodels.com/webhelp/rungtap/index.html?hc_solmethod.htm

Guo Z, Zhang X, Feng S, Zhang H. 2020. The impacts of reducing renewable energy subsidies on China's energy transition by using a hybrid dynamic computable general equilibrium model. Front Energy Res. 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.00025

Hertel TW. 1997. Global trade analysis: modeling and applications. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.

Horridge M. 2008. MSplitCom: Programs to disaggregate a GTAP sector. Centre of Policy Studies. Available from: https://www.copsmodels.com/msplitcom.htm

Horridge M. 2011. GTAPAdjust: a program to balance or adjust a GTAP database. Centre of Policy Studies. Available from: https://www.copsmodels.com/archivep.htm

ITC. 2024. Trade Map-Markets for fibreboard of wood or other ligneous materials. Available from: https://www.trademap.org/Index.aspx

Jalbert D. 2025. Does the US really need Canadian wood products supply? Fastmarkets. Available from: https://www.fastmarkets.com/insights/does-the-us-really-need-canadian-wood-products-supply/

Janzen N, Freestone C. 2024. Proof Point: Canada's economy might not be in recession but it feels like one. RBC. Available from: https://www.rbc.com/en/thought-leadership/canadas-economy-might-not-be-in-recession-but-it-feels-like-one/

Lamica A. 2025. Can US federal land offset imported Canadian timber products? Fastmarkets. Available from: https://www.fastmarkets.com/insights/can-us-federal-land-offset-imported-canadian-forest-products/

Liu C-K, Kuo N-F, Hseu J-S. 2005. Effects of tariff liberalization on the global forest sector: application of the GTAP model. Int For Rev. 7(3):218-226. https://doi.org/10.1505/ifor.2005.7.3.218

Nagubadi RV, Thompson H, Zhang D. 2009. Productivity and trade during the softwood lumber dispute. Int Trade J. 23(3):301-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853900903012278

NAHB. 2025. NAHB secures lumber inclusion in delay of Mexican and Canadian tariffs. Available from: https://www.nahb.org/blog/2025/03/canada-mexico-tariffs-delayed-higher-lumber-prices-still-likely

Narayanan Gopalakrishnan B, Ciuriak D, Singh H. 2015. Quantifying the mega-regional trade agreements: a review of the models. In: Quantifying Mega-Regional Trade Agreements. p. 93-131. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2611025

Ochuodho TO, Lantz VA, Olale E. 2016. A computable general equilibrium analysis of the United States-Canada 2006 Softwood Lumber Agreement. For Sci. 62(6):679-689. https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.15-093

Poudel J, Dahal R. 2025. A comprehensive look at the forest products industry's economic contribution to the United States: pre- and post-COVID analysis. For Policy Econ. 172:103440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103440

ResourceWise. 2019. Structural changes in log supply hinder wood products industry in PNW. Available from: https://www.resourcewise.com/market-watch-blog/structural-changes-in-log-supply-hinder-wood-products-industry-in-pnw

Richard W. 2003. An analysis of the timber situation in the United States: 1952 to 2050. Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR-560. Portland (OR): USDA Forest Service. Available from: https://research.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/5284

Richford M. 2022. How furniture companies in Mexico are bypassing supply chain issues. NAPS Inc. Available from: https://napsintl.com/uncategorized/how-furniture-companies-in-mexico-are-bypassing-supply-chain-issues/

Roos EL, Adams PD. 2020. The economy-wide impact of subsidy reform: a CGE analysis. World Trade Rev. 19(S1):S18-S38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745620000257

Scott SG, Koch LP, Simmons EA, Morgan TA, Dillon T, Christensen GA. 2025. Washington's forest products industry and timber harvest, 2020. PNW-GTR-1032. USDA Forest Service. https://doi.org/10.2737/pnw-gtr-1032

SGSF. 2023. Suppliers and investors-Southern Group of State Foresters. Available from: https://southernforests.org/suppliers-and-investors/

Trade Monitor. 2025. Trade Data Monitor-OSB trade. Available from: https://www1.tdmlogin.com/tdm/default.asp

USDA. 2025. Forest products. Research and Development. Available from: https://research.fs.usda.gov/forestproducts

USITC. 2023. Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-566 and 731-TA-1342 (Review). US International Trade Commission. Available from: https://www.usitc.gov/publications/701_731/pub5479.pdf

Woodall CW, Piva RJ, Luppold WG, Skog KE, Ince PJ. 2011. An assessment of the downturn in the forest products sector in the northern United States. For Prod J. 61(8):604-613. https://doi.org/10.13073/0015-7473-61.8.604

World Bank. 2024. GDP growth (annual %)-All countries. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org

Xinnan L. 2025. Pulp and paper caught in the cross fire of a new North American trade war. Available from: https://media.rabobank.com/m/449c714100241cf7/original/Pulp-and-paper-caught-in-the-cross-fire-of-a-new-North-American-trade-war.pdf

Zhang D. 2010. The softwood lumber war: politics, economics, and the long US-Canadian trade dispute. New York (NY): Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781936331581

Zhang Y, Goodwin BK. 2024. Substitutability of U.S. and Canadian softwood lumber: a threshold modeling approach. For Policy Econ. 169:103343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103343

Most read articles by the same author(s)